|
Barry Critchley
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
This is the tale of one couple's
battle to regain money lost when
they invested with Ian Thow, a
former senior vice-president in the
Victoria office of Berkshire
Securities, who almost two years
back skipped the country, leaving
$32-million in losses. It's not a
happy tale. It has dragged on and
reflects badly on some participants
in the world of mutual funds, the
companies that employ them and the
regulators that oversee them. The
couple is Kirk Wong and Krista
Kleven, who gave Thow $133,000 to
invest in preferred shares of
National Commercial Bank Jamaica.
History
The two gave money to Thow
personally between December, 2002,
and February, 2005. Thow was a
senior vice-president at Berkshire
and Berkshire was part of the AIC
Group. And AIC, controlled by
Michael Lee-Chin, has just bought
the bank in Jamaica. In June, 2005,
Thow left the country and has not
been heard from since. He is
scheduled to appear before the B.C.
Securities Commission this summer.
Wong said Thow told him and his wife
"that he was going to get the shares
through Edward Gayle & Co. Ltd. [a
Jamaican brokerage now owned by
Lee-Chin.]" Wong and his wife
completed the necessary forms and
faxed them back to Berkshire's
Victoria office. At the same time --
the summer of 2002 -- they opened
another Berkshire account and
deposited $15,000.
When they opened the account, Wong
asked for "confirmation." In turn,
Thow signed a letter on Berkshire
letterhead saying the following:
"Welcome to the Berkshire Investment
Group Inc. We would like to thank
you for the trust that you have
shown us by investing with
Berkshire. With the opportunities
available, we assure you have made
the right decision." The letter
noted Thow had received the $15,000
and added, "we have enclosed your
copies of the documentation we
completed to open your new
accounts."
Prior to making that investment,
Thow told Wong he "owned 2% of each
of Berkshire and of AIC." Thow said
AIC "was purchasing the bank [in
Jamaica] and he could get us into
some preferred shares," at
attractive rates.
"The preferred price was 30?
Jamaican," said Wong, who also met
Lee-Chin when he came to the
Vancouver. "We went to 'Meet the
Billionaire' in 2003 and that's when
he [Lee-Chin] promoted the bank in
Jamaica," he said.
"The meeting was a big event for
Thow," said Wong, who noted that at
regular intervals Thow would advise
him and his wife of the worth of
their investment. "It was all on his
personal computer and also on the
files at his office. "But we did not
get share certificates."
Dealings with Berkshire
In March,
2006, Wong and Kleven wrote a
three-page letter to the compliance
department at Berkshire's head
office in Burlington. That letter
sets out the details of their
investment with Thow and Berkshire.
In that letter, written at the
request of a senior Berkshire
staffer, the two state the value of
their investment is $5- million but
add, "we cannot get our money back.
Thow told us that Michael Lee-Chin
had personally approved the purchase
of these Jamaican bank shares for
certain friends and Berkshire
clients of Ian Thow," it said.
Nine months later, the couple
received a reply, but not from
Berkshire. Instead, the letter was
sent by Torys, Berkshire's counsel.
That letter told them to shove off.
"Though we are sympathetic to the
impact the alleged transaction has
had on you, you knew that you were
not dealing with Berkshire with
respect to the alleged transaction
but rather with Ian Thow personally.
Berkshire is respectfully declining
any compensation to you. In so
doing, Berkshire fully encourages
you to cooperate and assist the
police authorities, British Columbia
Securities Commission and the Mutual
Fund Dealers Association with
respect of their investigations
concerning Ian Thow."
The couple disagree: At all times,
they say, Thow represented himself
as a Berkshire representative.
The letter hoped that the foregoing
"concludes the matter ... any
further communications from you in
respect of your claim, they are to
be directed to me [not Berkshire] in
writing. I ask that Mr. Wong
immediately cease and desist his
harassment of Berkshire."
It is worth noting that Berkshire
has "conducted mediations with 17
complainants," a number of whom have
been reimbursed for giving cash to
Thow that was in turn invested in
mortgages. Wong, who has wonderful
research skills, says he has found
evidence of a Berkshire client
receiving compensation for an
investment in the Jamaican bank.
A few weeks back, the couple wrote
to Berkshire requesting a copy of
its policies and procedures
regarding client complaints. "They
sent a legal letter and refused to
give me a copy," said Wong, who
argues Berkshire is trying to force
the couple into expensive and
time-consuming litigation.
Julie Clarke, Berkshire's general
counsel, could not be reached for
comment.
Dealings with MFDA
Last August, the
two met with a Toronto staffer of
the MFDA. Since then, no contact.
"We don't know what's going on. But
they are letting Berkshire send us
letters saying 'they are not
responsible for Thow.' " But Wong,
who has become an expert on the
workings on the MFDA, argues one of
the rules stipulates Berkshire
"shall be liable to all third
parties, including clients for the
acts and omissions of employees
relating to the member's business."
Shaun Devlin, MFDA's vice-president,
said, "we are conducting a thorough
investigation, and that takes time."
Summary
The couple say the MFDA "has
all the power to take care of the
situation and to stop Berkshire."
They add that "these types of
stories happen way too often and it
doesn't seem that the regulatory
bodies can give the public any
answers. Everything is confidential,
they can't comment and can't keep us
updated. It's very frustrating for
investors. Nobody seems to want to
do their job," said Kleven, who was
forced to add an extra $189,000 to
their mortgage to "get us out of
this mess."
bcritchley@nationalpostl.com
|