|
Christopher Morgis et al., vs. Thomson Kernaghan and Co. Ltd
Motion to obtain a
court order naming the
Investment Dealers Association of Canada as defendants in this action.
Court File No. 01-CV-203394
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
G.F.Kym Anthony
Incoming IDA Chairman (Chair in 2003)
(National Bank Financial) |
Joseph J. Oliver
President and CEO, IDA (ex-2007)
President, MFDA
Chairman, Financial Services Council of Canada |
Terry Salman
Outgoing IDA Chair,
2003
|
|
|
Further sanctions sought against former Thomson
Kernaghan chief |

28 January 2005
|
|
|
WHERE DOES NEGLIGENCE
FIT INTO OUR SOCIAL FABRIC?
|
|
All of us understand that deliberately causing injury to others is a criminal offence ordinarily resulting in
punishment of the perpetrator.
All of us understand that some injuries are accidental, i.e. the circumstances giving rise to them are wholly
unforeseeable. No one is responsible.
No compensation is payable.
In between those two ends of the spectrum are `negligent acts’ i.e., they are not deliberate, but the injury is foreseeable.
The negligent person will not be punished, however the injured party may seek financial compensation as a result.
The compensation is paid by the individual who has caused the loss.
Duty of care requires everything ‘reasonably practicable’ to be done to protect the public welfare.
|
|
|
 |
|
Could the Investment
Dealer's Association be liable to individual investment firm
clients? |
|
by Angela Yadav and Kenneth A. Dekker
In 2003, the Ontario Court of Appeal decided in Morgis v.
Thomson Kernaghan & Co.[9]
that the Investment Dealers’ Association of Canada (“IDA”)
cannot be held liable to individual investment dealer clients
for failing to supervise one of its members. In refusing to
allow disgruntled Thomson Kernaghan (“TK”) clients to sue the
IDA for its failure to ensure TK complied with IDA regulations,
the court found that the IDA does not owe a duty of care to
individual clients. Instead, the IDA owes a duty to protect the
public in general and has protections against liability similar
to those enjoyed by statutory regulators such as law societies.
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was denied.
However, the extent of the IDA’s protection against liability is
called into question by recent decisions of both Canada’s
Supreme Court and B.C.’s Court of Appeal. Last June, the Supreme
Court found in Finney v. Barreau du Québec[10]
that the body regulating Quebec lawyers was liable to the
plaintiff for failing to properly handle complaints against her
former lawyer. The court found that the Barreau’s statutory
immunity for actions done in good faith did not protect it from
liability for recklessness, extreme carelessness or intentional
misconduct.
The B.C. Court of Appeal subsequently indicated in V.M. v.
Stewart[11] that it could not see why Finney would not allow
individuals to sue regulators in the rest of Canada. In V.M. v.
Stewart, a patient’s action against the B.C. College of
Physicians & Surgeons was allowed to proceed. There is no reason
why the principles in Finney could not also allow claims against
regulatory bodies such as the IDA or the OSC, where intentional
misconduct , recklessness or extreme carelessness is proven. At
a minimum, the IDA and OSC should feel a little less secure in
their supposed immunity from liability to the investing public!
[9] (2003), 65 O.R. (3d) 321 (
C.A. ).
[10] 2004 SCC 36.
[11] [2004] B.C.J. No. 1852 (BCCA).
|
|
|
Paul Bourque |
IDA finally took action on Rampart Securities |

September 2001 |
|
"There is a positive duty to inquire on any warning signals and take immediate steps to remedy the problems".
-Paul Bourque, S.V.P. Member Regulation, IDA
|
|
|

Mark Valentine |
Where
were CANADIAN regulators?
Where
was TK's Compliance Officer? |

Chris
Morgis |
|
|
Bay St.
Brokerage at the Center of Perfect Legal Storm |

05 May 2001
|
|
|
Statement of Allegations re: Mark Valentine |

24 June 2002
|
|
|
Investor sues IDA over its handling of Thomson |

26 July 2002 |
|
|
Market cures: Take a vacation and bring in the lawyers |

27 July 2002 |
|
|
"Staff
submit that they have presented sufficient evidence to call into
serious question Valentine's integrity. By creating a culture of
conflict and non-compliance and acting in his own interests at the
expense of his clients, Valentine failed to deal fairly, honestly
and in good faith with his clients." -OSC |
30 July 2002 |
|
|
Valentine indicted in fraud ring |

16 August 2002
|
|
|
FBI arrests star Canadian trader |

16 August 2002
|
|
|
OSC to continue Valentine probe |

17 August 2002
|
|
|
"When I dialed 911 to the IDA, nobody came." |

20 August 2002
|
|
|
Regulators probing Thompson Kernaghan executives
"Our own regulators and enforcement people were sleeping at the wheel." |
 20 August 2002 |
|
|
Why didn't regulators listen to Thomson Kernaghan warnings? |

31 August 2002 |
|
|
"I suspect (TK) won't pay all of its debts" |

06 September 2002 |
|
|
Canadian Investor Protection Fund required to ante up $18.1 million |

06 September 2002 |
|
|
Valentine sells assets to cover defaulted loan |
 23 October 2002 |
|
|
Hey American dealers, where are all those stock certificates (street form) that T.K. sold to you in the "death spiral financing" deals? It must have left a gaping whole in your accounting records. Who is going to
deliver them to you or who are you going to sue? (eh?) |
 |
|
Are you covered by the Canadian Investor Protection Fund? |
 |
|
Will you sue The IDA? After all, you were a CLIENT (just ask Ernst & Young) on the books of TK and regulated by NASD Regulation. $18.1 Million paid out by CIPF must look like chicken feed in comparison. CIPF can't be too pleased with the IDA either.
|
|
|
"This is bigger than Hicks and Valentine. This has been allowed to occur through a lack of supervision by our NASD (the U.S. National Association of Securities
Dealers) and other regulatory organizations - and equally your organizations in Canada". |

15 October 2002
|
|
|
Brokerage Collapse Hits Canadian Fund Hard
"There is nothing I can think of that would prevent us from covering a short sale," says Love of the Investor Protection Fund. At the same time, she says, "I have not been made aware that there is a huge short position in any account at the date of
insolvency."
Barbara Love, V.P. and Secretary, Canadian Investor Protection Fund |

18 October 2002
|
|
|
Predator or Prey? - Death Spiral Financing |

28 October 2002
|
|
|
BLAME CANADA |

28 October 2002
|
|
|
Ernst & Young slaps 47 former T.K. staff with $76M Lawsuit |

11 December 2002
|
|
|
Derek DeCloet of the National Post speaks with CBC's Jeannie Lee about stock fraud and Mark Valentine |

|
|
|
CBC's Ron Charles reports on Mark Valentine |

|
|
|
CBC report
following postponement of Sept. 06, 2002 hearing. |

|
|
|
IDA requests Statutory Immunity |

30 May 2002 |
|
|
|
|
Cooper v Hobart
|
IDA FACTUM
 |
MORGIS FACTUM
 |
|
|
IDA DENIES IT'S ACCOUNTABLE FOR LOSSES
|

10 September 2002 |
|
|
Superior Court Decision |

|
|
|
Ontario Judge excludes IDA from TK suit |

26 September 2002 |
|
|
IDA welcomes court decision |

26 September 2002 |
|
|
Can Regulators be Sued?
EXCELLENT READ |

26 September 2002 |
|
|
Brokerage regulator can't be sued by investor |

27 September 2002 |
|
|
Investor can't sue regulator
|

27 September 2002 |
|
|
TK client loses bid to sue IDA
|

27 September 2002 |
|
|
Shameful
Politicians Neglect Regulators
EXCELLENT READ |

27 September 2002
|
|
|
Ottawa Pledges to
Improve Securities Regulation |

30 September 2002 |
|
|
Superior Court decision APPEALED
|
| Investor Appeals Ontario Superior Court decision |

03 October 2002 |
|
|
Brokerage Client to Appeal |

03 October 2002 |
|
|
Court will consider whether IDA should be held accountable to individual investors |

03 October 2002 |
|
|
Investor seeks precedent in IDA lawsuit |

15 October 2002 |
|
|
Two years after Chris Morgis filed complaints with the IDA
against Pat Teggart & TK.
|
|
|
IDA issues Allegations against Pat Teggart |

25 March 2003 |
|
|
Discipline Penalties Imposed on Patrick Teggart (IDA can't collect) |

11 April 2003 |
|
|
|
|
Court of Appeal for Ontario
|
|
|
The APPEAL |
 |
|
The DECISION |

|
|
|
IDA welcomes decision |

25 June 2003 |
|
|
U.S. Judge dismisses suit against TK, Valentine |

11 July 2003
|
|
Investor seeks Leave to Appeal to
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
Supreme
Court Appeal sought in law suit to include IDA |

18 July 2003 |
|
|
Application for leave to appeal |

16 October 2003 |
|
|
Leave
to Appeal Denied |
|
Judge denies motion to
sue IDA |

09 April 2004 |
|
|
Supreme Court
dismisses case against IDA |

08 April 2004 |
|
|
IDA welcomes Morgis
decision |

08 April 2004 |
|
|
Exposing
advisors to legal action |

September 2003 |
|
"In June, when the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled against that motion, it was a prime example of "judge-made law". The Ontario Court of Appeals extended immunity to the Investment Dealers Association even though there is no statutory basis for doing so." |
|

|